Off to See the Wizard
Surely not the Wizard:
"I think you are a very bad man," said Dorothy.
"Oh, no, my dear; I'm really a very good man, but I'm a very bad Wizard, I must admit."
"Can't you give me brains?" asked the Scarecrow.
"You don't need them. You are learning something every day. A baby has brains, but it doesn't know much. Experience is the only thing that brings knowledge, and the longer you are on earth the more experience you are sure to get."
Perhaps this sounds like sound advice; but certainly not Godlike. The Wizard indulged the Scarecrow in the end, and stuffed his head with "a measure of bran, which he mixed with a great many pins and needles" to make him "sharp."
What is the source of the power in Oz? Is the use of power outside of God's glory condemned in Bible teachings on witchcraft? I must admit, when the mouse queen advises Dorothy to say a charm to call the Winged Monkeys to her command, I felt distinctly uncomfortable. Is this a pricking of my conscience, or simply squeamishness?
AFA Journal, http://www.afa.net/journal/february/2002/harrypotter.asp , asks regarding movies such as Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings and the Wizard of Oz, "How do we define the evil that is to be opposed, and upon what basis do we decide between those for whom we cheer and those we don’t?...Tolkien’s wizards are not wizards in the Harry Potter sense. Instead, they are more akin to angelic beings – capable of falling into a state of dark corruption and rebellion against the One True God who created them (as explained in Tolkien’s background history to Lord of the Rings, entitled The Silmarillon.)The Lord of the Rings trilogy also contains sublime spiritual insights founded upon a Christian worldview, which is lacking in Harry Potter. These truths include the power of sin to corrupt and enslave; the self-deluding power of pride; and the nature of demonic evil as personal and universally destructive, rather than psychological or metaphorical."
Note that the Wizard of Oz movie is different from the book in important respects, and this may alter your arguments. For one thing, I suggest that if you write an essay with the contention that "Satan's footwear is red," that you must first deal with the fact that in the book, Dorothy's slippers were silver. The book is now in public domain; Get your own free copy of Baum's Wizard of Oz at http://www.gutenberg.org/etext/6896.
What do you think? Blog your comments.